The “Why?” of Benghazi: “a pretext to kill more Muslims, to steal more resources” for 45 Different Corporations

10:50 AM Monday, May 13, 2013


by Scott Creighton
May, 2012 – “The New Alliance was announced in conjunction with the G8 meeting last Friday. Under the scheme, some 45 corporations, including Monsanto, Syngenta, Yara International, Cargill, DuPont, and PepsiCo, have pledged a total of $3.5 billion in investment in Africa. The full list of corporations and commitments has just been released, and one of the most notable is Yara International’s promise to build a $2 billion fertilizer plant in Africa.” How the US Sold Africa to Multinationals Like Monsanto, Cargill, DuPont, PepsiCo and Others
A $3.5 billion dollar investment is one hell of a “why” now isn’t it? The conference mentioned above actually took place at the The Chicago Council on Global Affairs, “Founded in 1922 as The Chicago Council on Foreign Relations“
In May of 2012, a plan is announced at the Council on Foreign Relations to effectively recolonize the whole of Africa for 45 of our favorite crony corporations. Immediately a film created by the FBI via one of their confidential informants, a guy on federal probation, is retooled and released as the pretext for a new “angry Muslim” uprising. In Sept. of 2012 an attack takes place killing one of our ambassadors. It was conducted by a group who previously worked for us and who currently worked for the government of the town that was attacked. In Nov. of that same year, the military launched a new wave of invasions, small quiet invasions, all across Africa. Those Special Forces led operations paved the way for our crony corporations and their conquest of the African continent. No one questioned why the first black president was committing U.S. troops to Africa in the wake of the Benghazi psyop.

“The invasion has almost nothing to do with “Islamism”, and almost everything to do with the acquisition of resources, notably minerals, and an accelerating rivalry with China.
Unlike China, the US and its allies are prepared to use a degree of violence demonstrated in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and Palestine.” John Pilger, Feb. 2013
——–
Clinton with al-Qaeda linked terrorists who destabilized Libya
Across the artificial political divide of the MSM, there is a fire-storm brewing over the Benghazi attacks, something I like to call the Innocence of the Muslims Psyop.
The left is busy reinforcing the notion that nothing too illegalhappened and if it did, their most popular product spokespeople (Obama and Clinton) aren’t to be tainted with the blood of the fallen while the republican leaning centrist Business First organizations carefully dance around the issuepretending to get to the bottom of the new revelations from the whistle-blowers without really doing anything of the sort.
This isn’t “dereliction of duty”.  Clinton’s State Department was all over this thing from the very beginning just like they were the destabilization of Libya with these same terrorists. This is something much worse and Rand Paul knows it.
But what has clearly been forgotten in the ongoing narrative is what actually happened in Benghazi, what led up to it, who did it and what happened in the aftermath. These are the things you can’t forget. These are the things that made it what it was.
When an operation like this takes place, there is a reason for it and though professional apologists like Jon Stewart will tell you there is no “why” out there being discussed by the republicans, which he is correct in saying, it does exist. I myself have seen it since the very beginning (Sept. 14th 2012) and so have many others:
“This major crisis in all the countries will be a justification for more boots on the ground the same way they’re ready to go into Libya now…It becomes a pretext to kill more Muslims, to steal more resources,”member of Dignity, Human Rights and Peace Randy Short, Sept. 15th 2012
No, the republicrats aren’t saying why it was done or how involved in the planning of the operation the current administration was and there is good reason for that: they as an institution support the overall agenda, using our military and Special Forces to garner greater control of the resources of Africa for the various corporations who pay their unofficial off-the-books salaries.
But if you remember the facts of the case as reported by “legitimate” main-stream sources over the past few months, you find that it’s pretty obvious that there were crimes committed and accountability should be sought for those responsible.
A U.S. Ambassador and 3 other Americans were killed in a country where the State Department had just induced yet another of our “humanitarian” regime changes. The country, Libya, was one of the targets listed by Gen. Westley Clark when he exposed the “7 countries in 5 years” plan.
Those 5 Americans were killed by the same group that were used to destabilize the country just a few short months prior to the attack, a group of mercenary terrorists called Ansar al-Sharia. That same organization worked for the government that we installed in Benghazi, the birth place of our State Department’s destabilization campaign in Libya.
It began around nightfall on Sept. 11 with around 150 bearded gunmen, some wearing the Afghan-style tunics favored by Islamic militants, sealing off the streets leading to the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi. They set up roadblocks with pick-up trucks mounted with heavy machine guns, according to witnesses.
The trucks bore the logo of Ansar al-Shariah, a powerful local group of Islamist militants who worked with the municipal government to manage security in Benghazi, the main city in eastern Libya and birthplace of the uprising last year that ousted Moammar Gadhafi after a 42-year dictatorship.
There was no sign of a spontaneous protest against an American-made movie denigrating Islam’s Prophet Muhammad. But a lawyer passing by the scene said he saw the militants gathering around 20 youths from nearby to chant against the film. Within an hour or so, the assault began, guns blazing as the militants blasted into the compound.” Washington Post
(The Washington Post scrubbed that article out of existence, but I saved much of it,here)
The State Department had been warned of a lack of security at the compound and yet they failed to inform their personnel in the country of that warning.
“According to senior diplomatic sources, the US State Department had credible information 48 hours before mobs charged the consulate in Benghazi, and the embassy in Cairo, that American missions may be targeted, but no warnings were given for diplomats to go on high alert and “lockdown”, under which movement is severely restricted.” Independent
Yet remarkably, Amb. Stevens was sent back to Benghazi in the middle of the ongoing violence, just hours before the attack, in spite of the warnings of inadequate security and other violent attacks in the area.
“There have been similar attacks in Benghazi on the Red Cross and the UN.It is not clear why the US ambassador had returned to Benghazi at a time of security concerns.” Guardian
The security for that location was provided under contract by the February 17th Martyrs Brigade, an organization with ties to Ansar al-Sharia. They left the compound prior to the attack, leaving the gate open.
Several entries on the militia’s Facebook page openly profess sympathy for Ansar al-Sharia, the hardline Islamist extremist group widely blamed  for the deadly attack on the mission. The U.S. State Department did not respond to a Newsmax request for an explanation as to why the February 17th Martyrs Brigade was hired to protect the mission. NewsMax
According to a recent whistle-blower, Amb. Stevens was taken to a hospital controlled by Ansar al-Sharia where he was pronounced dead.
In the immediate aftermath the State Department began lying about the attack, claiming it was completely unexpected, that it was caused by a reaction to a 14 film “The Innocence of the Muslims” and that it was an unplanned spontaneous riot caused by anger to the film.
“Political considerations influenced the talking points that U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice used five days after the deadly Sept. 11 assault in Benghazi, Libya, with State Department and other senior administration officials asking that references to terror groups and prior warnings be deleted, according to department emails.” Huffington Post May 11th 2013
It was clear from the start that this operation was well planned and not a spontaneous response to a film by a bunch of angry Muslims.
“The way these perpetrators acted and moved — I think we, and they’re choosing the specific date for this so-called demonstration, I think we have no, this leaves us with no doubt that this was pre-planned, determined,”
It was planned, definitely, it was planned by foreigners, by people who entered the country a few months ago, and they were planning this criminal act since their arrival,” Libyan President Mohamed Yousef El-Magariaf
Yet professional opinion makers like Bill Maher still blame that video for the attacks to this day. The film had nothing to do with the attacks.
The maker of the film, Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, was an FBI informant on federal probation who had made it a year prior to the attack as a honey-pot to entrap angry radicalized Muslims in Los Angeles. Back then was called “The Innocence of bin Laden”.
“The original title was “The Innocence of Bin Laden,” which the filmmaker expected would attract an audience of radical Islamists who would become disillusioned about their faith after watching, Klein said” SFG
(The San Francisco Gate article has been scrubbed from the internet, but I quoted much of it here.)
Nakoula went out and gave interviews after the Benghazi attack under the assumed name of “Sam Bacile” pretending to be some kind of angry Christian funded by angry Jews.  But as soon as his real identity was uncovered and his ties to the FBI were exposed, the federal government locked him away so he would face no more scrutiny. It wasn’t about religion… it was a state sponsored film used as a pretext.
In the days just after the attack, when things were getting out of hand for the administration and Victoria Nuland was still lying through her teeth about it, they effectively shut down any and all questioning of the official narrative till they could get their stories straight. This is yet another often overlooked aspect of this case.
“All aspects of the attack, including what led up to it, its causes, the identity of the perpetrators, and the circumstances surrounding the death of Amb. Chris Stevens and the other three Americans, are off limits for reporters.” Foreign Policy mag
In the aftermath, they edited CIA documents as too erase mentions of their client terrorist organization and continued to lie about the nature of the attack for weeks after it was well known that the video had nothing to do with it. Whistle-blowers have pointed out that there could have been Special Forces troops on the ground in that compound within minutes of the start of the attack yet they were effectively told to stand down and let it happen.
“Mr. Hicks testified this morning that the stand down order for the rescue team in Tripoli came from either AFRICOM or SOCAFRICA. General Ham. leader of AFRICOM, may have been in Washington DC at the time.”
“AFRICOM leader General Carter Ham was never given the order to secure the consulate in Benghazi. This is what the general told Rep. Jason Chaffetz after the 9-11 Benghazi terror attack. That means only Barack Obama or Defense Secretary Panetta, the two men above the AFRICOM commander, never ordered an operation to secure the consulate.”Gateway Pundit
And don’t forget, a drone was actually filming most of the attack, live as it happened.
The United States had an unmanned Predator drone over its consulate in Benghazi during the attack that slaughtered four Americans — which should have led to a quicker military response, it was revealed yesterday.
“They stood, and they watched, and our people died,” former CIA commander Gary Berntsen told CBS News.” NYP Oct. 12, 2012
A U.S.Ambassador and support personnel are dead. The level of the current administration’s involvement through-out the event is unmistakable. Efforts to lie about various aspects of the attack after the fact were made in direct violation of law. Of course there should be investigations starting with “The Innocence of bin Laden” and ending with the hospital run by our terrorists, Ansar al-Sharia and investigations into the new claims by the whistle-blowers about the stand down orders.
Looking at all of this in the context of an operation with a clearly defined purpose, how do you not see the real motivation behind it?
What kind of country do we live in where our media pundits can actually get away with trying to claim that there is nothing to see here when if one takes the time to evaluate what we already know to be true, you couldn’t miss it if you tried?
U.S. Army units to head to Africa – Dec. 24th, 2012
How the US Sold Africa to Multinationals Like Monsanto, Cargill, DuPont, PepsiCo and Others - May 2012
May, 2012 – “The New Alliance was announced in conjunction with the G8 meeting last Friday. Under the scheme, some 45 corporations, including Monsanto, Syngenta, Yara International, Cargill, DuPont, and PepsiCo, have pledged a total of $3.5 billion in investment in Africa. The full list of corporations and commitments has just been released, and one of the most notable is Yara International’s promise to build a $2 billion fertilizer plant in Africa.” How the US Sold Africa to Multinationals Like Monsanto, Cargill, DuPont, PepsiCo and Others
Do you get it now?

Posted in , , by Unknown |

0 commenti :

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )
 

Copyright 2009

.